The Great Untangling, part one: Why should you stop using US services?
This is part one of my series: “The Great Untangling”, the series in which I document my journey away from US tech. This first post answers why I do it—and why I think you should too. In the next post, I will write about my journey. I’ve invested quite some time into my untangling, and I hope publishing about my journey will help you make the switch more easily.
This is by no means an exhaustive list. Any one of those reasons below should be enough to act. That I have to limit how many I list should give you pause.
1—Trust and Data Safety
As we’ve seen repeatedly by now, trust in the US administration and in US institutions is misplaced. You can no longer rely on the US adhering to its laws and promises. Additionally, the transatlantic agreement to handle data safely, protect it, and not abuse it is under attack by Trump.1
Then there is the US CLOUD Act.2, 3 It gives US authorities the legal basis to access all data stored on servers belonging to a US company, regardless of its physical location. We must expect the US government to access whatever data they see fit, including that of EU government institutions.
Third, given the history of US espionage, encryption algorithms coming out of the US should not be trusted. Their source has to be verified independently. This includes those used in WhatsApp and iMessage.
2—Reliability and Coercion
By using US services, you are making yourself vulnerable to its current Clown and Commander in Chief. What makes you think he won’t hold your, or your company’s, data hostage as a bargaining chip in negotiations? He did it with private-sector satellite images Ukraine needs to defend its civilian population from Russian aggression.4
Additionally, the Trump administration threatened sanctions on the ICC (International Criminal Court) for a judgement on Israel’s Prime Minister they disagree with. The court stores essentially all evidence on Microsoft Azure, making it vulnerable to the US.5 This further highlights the emergency that Europe’s dependence on US IT represents.
There are more examples of the US cutting off access to data already.6, 7 Why shouldn’t he do it with your AWS instance, Microsoft 365, or even Gmail accounts?
3—Competitiveness and Diversity
Some companies from the US are holding on to DEI,8 which is great, but many aren’t. Another way to improve DEI is to have a more diverse market, shared by more diverse companies from more places. Although this will not help minorities unfortunate enough to live in the US, at least it will improve diversity in general.
Europe has been asleep at the wheel in the IT sector for decades. While we are slowly gaining in some areas, we are still far, very far, behind in others. For example, we have no consumer-facing and user-friendly operating systems of our own, instead the entire continent relies on Windows and macOS—with few exceptions.
I am only aware of two projects—but hopefully, there are more—aiming to replace US software with trustworthy products. One, France’s National Gendarmerie (police) uses GendBuntu, an Ubuntu Linux-based OS, they develop domestically. Two, the state of Schleswig-Holstein in Germany is currently replacing all proprietary software with Open-Source-Software and aims to make the switch to Linux.9, 10
Aside: When you look at these examples, you’ll notice they are likely UX nightmares, but at least they are safe from US extortionary threats. They can’t be cut off from their own data by a foreign government. I hope these efforts to replace proprietary software with Open-Source Software quickly shift from a tech-first to a design-driven decision-making structure.
4—(Neo-)Imperialism vs. Sovereignty
Last on this list, but perhaps most important: We should boycott countries that exhibit aggressive and imperialistic behaviour to protect and defend our democracy and values. We boycott Russia because they invaded Ukraine. And we should boycott the US while they wage trade-wars against democratic countries, or threaten to invade them.11
Call to Action
As long as the default setup is to buy a Windows laptop or an iPad on Amazon and set it up with a Gmail, Outlook, or iCloud account, the US will remain dominant in consumer electronics. As long as the default for software development is GitHub and Visual Studio Code, the US will remain dominant in software development. As long as AWS and GoDaddy are the default for deploying web-sites and -services, the US will remain dominant.
We should make the effort to switch away from those defaults to support a more diverse and competitive, and global tech landscape. The result will be better software and services through competition from outside the US tech(-bro) bubble.
In my next post in this series, “The Great Untangling”, I will write about my journey. I’ve invested quite some time into my untangling, and I hope publishing about my journey will help you make the switch more easily.
Footnotes:
-
Trump issued the executive order on "Ensuring Accountability for All Agencies" 18 Feb. 2025. […] The potential concern with the accountability executive order is that it might infringe on the FTC's ability to be sufficiently independent to enforce the DPF privacy principles in accordance with GDPR Article 44(2)(b).
and
Second, on or around 23 Jan. 2025, the Trump administration reportedly terminated all three Democratic members of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board […] PCLOB. […] The potential concern […] is that the PCLOB provides privacy-related oversight of the activities of US intelligence agencies generally. In the context of the DPF specifically, the PCLOB has certain designated roles to be consulted on the appointment of judges for the DPRC [Data Protection Review Court] and the appointment of special advocates to assist the DPRC. The PCLOB is also responsible for conducting an annual review of the DPF redress mechanism for handling signals intelligence complaints.
Source: How could Trump administration actions affect the EU-US Data Privacy Framework? ⤴ (scroll back)
-
The CLOUD Act primarily amends the Stored Communications Act (SCA) of 1986 to allow federal law enforcement to compel U.S.-based technology companies via warrant or subpoena to provide requested data stored on servers regardless of whether the data are stored in the U.S. or on foreign soil.—Quoted from: CLOUD Act (en.wikipedia.org)
-
The CLOUD Act and its Impact on Cross-Border Access to the Contents of Communications (alstonprivacy.com) ⤴ (scroll back)
-
US government revokes some access to satellite imagery for Ukraine ⤴ (scroll back)
-
ICC braces for swift Trump sanctions over Israeli arrest warrants ⤴ (scroll back)
-
France shows how Europe can survive Trump by TechAltar on YouTube. ⤴ (scroll back)
-
We have a temporary glitch with GitHub—probably some contributor was geolocated in a sanctioned region (no details yet). All required documents to unlock the account have been uploaded. Don't blame Microsoft/GitHub - it is just U.S. law. Please be patient. It should be unblocked soon. (Organic Maps via @organicmaps@mastodon.social) ⤴ (scroll back)
-
DEI is the acronym for diversity, equity, and inclusion. DEI frameworks aim to repair the damage caused by systemic racism, discrimination, and exclusivity. ⤴ (scroll back)
-
Official Statement: Der digital souveräne Verwaltungsarbeitsplatz ⤴ (scroll back)
-
Response to a series of questions asked by the YouTube channel TechAltar. ⤴ (scroll back)
-
Reporter at the White House meeting of President Trump and Mark Rutte, NATO Secretary General: “Mr. President, Greenland—what is your vision for the potential annexation of Greenland, and getting them potentially?” Trump: “Well I think it’ll happen […]”, Rutte adds context, then Trump continues and ends his answer with: “You know we have a couple of bases on Greenland already, and we have quite a few soldiers, maybe you’ll see more and more soldiers go there… I don’t know… […]” — Source: Trump Says He May Send More US Troops To Greenland by 10 News ⤴ (scroll back)